
Hello, YieldAlley readers! In this issue:
Active vs. Passive Fixed Income Investing
U.S. Markets Rally on Fed Rate Cut Signals Following Jackson Hole Remarks
Get Your Gym Membership Reimbursed Through Your HSA/FSA
Reaching the ‘Magic Number’ for Retirement Savings
And more!
NEWS
Standout Stories
🎲 Gamblers Now Bet on AI Models Like Racehorses (WSJ)
🎥 Drive-in movie theaters saw a surge in customers during the pandemic (CNN)
3️⃣ Tripling Your Net Worth in 5 Years (A Wealth of Common Sense)
🧠 Fees predict performance (Jeffrey Ptak)
📉 The share buyback’s rise sees the dividend’s demise (Robeco)
MARKET THOUGHTS
U.S. Markets Rally on Fed Rate Cut Signals Following Jackson Hole Remarks

ECONOMY
Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell delivered pivotal remarks at the Jackson Hole symposium on Friday, acknowledging shifting economic risks that "may warrant adjusting [the central bank's] policy stance," signaling potential rate cuts ahead as he highlighted concerns about emerging labor market weakness alongside restrictive interest rate levels. The S&P Global U.S. Purchasing Managers Index posted strong August readings with the composite PMI reaching 55.4—the fastest growth pace this year—and manufacturing PMI surging to a 39-month high of 53.3, well above contractionary expectations, though companies reported the steepest input price increases since May with tariffs cited as a key cost driver. Initial jobless claims rose to 235,000 for the week ended August 16, exceeding the 225,000 economist forecast, while continuing claims increased to 1.972 million from a revised 1.942 million the previous week.
STOCKS
U.S. equity markets posted strong weekly gains following Powell's dovish pivot, with the S&P 500 rising 17.11 points to 6,466.91 after losing ground in the first four trading days of the week, bringing year-to-date gains to 19.95%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average surged 685.62 points to 45,631.74 (up 7.26% YTD), while small and mid-cap stocks significantly outperformed with the Russell 2000 gaining 75.42 points to 2,361.95 (up 5.91% YTD) and the S&P Mid-Cap 400 advancing 83.49 points to 3,255.98 (up 4.33% YTD). The tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite bucked the trend, declining 126.44 points to 21,496.54 but maintaining an 11.32% year-to-date gain, likely reflecting profit-taking amid renewed concerns about AI infrastructure spending sustainability, while energy, real estate, financials, and materials sectors led Friday's gains with large-cap value stocks outperforming growth counterparts.
FIXED INCOME
U.S. Treasuries rallied strongly following Powell's Jackson Hole comments, with yields declining across the curve as bond prices moved higher after generating flat returns through Friday morning, reflecting increased investor confidence in potential Federal Reserve policy easing ahead. The Treasury market's Friday rally pushed down yields significantly as investors repositioned for a potentially less restrictive monetary policy stance, with the bond market response reinforcing expectations that the Fed may begin cutting rates in response to evolving economic conditions and labor market concerns outlined by the Fed chair.Tripling Your Net Worth in 5 Years
INCOME BUILDING
Active vs. Passive Fixed Income Investing
The question of whether to choose actively managed bond funds or passive index funds represents one of the most nuanced debates in fixed income investing. Unlike equity markets where passive indexing has largely won the performance battle, the bond market presents a more complex landscape where active management can potentially add meaningful value.
The Case Against Bond Index Funds
We cite analysis from MyPlanIQ that highlights several fundamental issues with traditional bond indexing. The most significant concern is that capitalization weighting in bond indices creates counterintuitive investment outcomes. When governments or corporations issue more debt, their bonds receive larger weights in the index, essentially rewarding entities for borrowing more money.
This structural flaw becomes particularly problematic during periods of heavy government borrowing. As Treasury bond prices have risen and the government has issued more debt, these securities have come to dominate popular indices like the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index (which underlies funds like Vanguard's Total Bond Market Index Fund). The analysis also notes that this benchmark has minimal exposure to high-yield bonds (less than 1%) and excludes municipal and foreign bonds entirely, potentially limiting diversification benefits.
Where Active Management Can Add Value
The fixed income market's structure creates several opportunities for skilled active managers to outperform:
Market Inefficiencies: Bond markets are often less efficient than equity markets, particularly in sectors like municipal bonds, corporate credit, and emerging market debt. Active managers can exploit pricing discrepancies and capitalize on temporary market dislocations.
Sector Rotation: Active managers can tactically adjust exposure to different bond sectors—shifting between government bonds, corporate credit, high-yield securities, and international debt based on relative value opportunities and market conditions.
Credit Analysis: In corporate and high-yield bond markets, fundamental credit analysis can be particularly valuable. Active managers can identify improving or deteriorating credit situations before they're fully reflected in prices.
Yield Curve Positioning: Skilled managers can adjust duration and yield curve positioning to take advantage of interest rate expectations and term structure movements.
Vanguard's Evolution on Active Fixed Income
Interestingly, even Vanguard, the pioneer of index fund investing, has embraced active fixed income management. In a recent Morningstar interview, new CEO Salim Ramji highlighted the firm's success in this area, noting that 98% of Vanguard's active fixed-income funds are in the lowest price decile, while 91% have outperformed their peers over the past decade.
Ramji emphasized that the active versus passive debate often misses the real point: price. When active management is available at reasonable fees, it can potentially deliver superior risk-adjusted returns without the structural limitations of cap-weighted bond indices.
Performance Track Record
The MyPlanIQ analysis provides compelling historical evidence for active bond management through 2016. Their research shows that several actively managed total return bond funds had consistently outperformed the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund over 15-year periods. For example:
Loomis Sayles Bond Retail delivered a 7.6% annualized return since 1997, compared to 5.4% for the Vanguard index fund
Even after Bill Gross's departure affected PIMCO Total Return's recent performance, it still maintained a 1% advantage over the index fund in 10-year returns through 2016
Dodge & Cox Income provided steady outperformance with lower volatility than more aggressive alternatives
The 2016 analysis also demonstrates that tactical allocation among top-performing active bond funds could have generated over 3.7% additional annualized returns compared to index investing over a 16-year period ending in 2016.
The Bottom Line
The fixed income landscape presents a more compelling case for active management than equity markets. The structural issues with cap-weighted bond indices, combined with the proven ability of skilled managers to add value at reasonable costs, suggest that investors shouldn't automatically default to passive bond investing.
However, success in active bond investing requires careful manager selection, attention to fees, and realistic expectations about the additional complexity involved. For many investors, a hybrid approach combining low-cost active management in certain sectors with index exposure in others may provide the optimal balance of performance potential and cost efficiency.
As Vanguard's evolution demonstrates, even the strongest proponents of indexing recognize that bond markets may require a more nuanced approach than their equity counterparts.
INCOME BUILDING
Cash Rates
Government Money Market Funds (7-Day Yields)
SNVXX (Schwab Government Money Fund - Investor Shares): 4.03%
SPAXX (Fidelity Government Money Market Fund): 3.96%
TTTXX (BlackRock Liquidity Funds: Treasury Trust - Institutional Class): 4.15%
VMFXX (Federal Money Market Fund): 4.20%
Brokered CD Rates (6-Month Rate)
Charles Schwab: 4.09%
E*Trade: 4.15%
Fidelity: 4.10%
Merrill Edge and Merrill Lynch: —
Vanguard: 4.10%
ETFs (30-Day Yields)
SGOV (iShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF): 4.23%
BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF): 4.16%
USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund): 4.23%
TFLO (iShares Treasury Floating Rate Bond ETF): 4.22%
DEALS AND BONUSES
Get Your Gym Membership Reimbursed Through Your HSA/FSA

Many people don't realize they can use their Health Savings Account or Flexible Spending Account to cover gym memberships and fitness expenses with the right medical documentation. While the IRS doesn't typically allow HSA/FSA funds for general fitness expenses, there's a workaround that's gaining popularity. The key is obtaining a Letter of Medical Necessity (LOMN) that connects your fitness routine to a medical condition. This essentially transforms your gym membership from a lifestyle choice into a prescribed medical treatment. Telehealth platforms have made this process increasingly accessible, offering quick consultations specifically designed to evaluate whether your situation qualifies.
Dr. B offers one such service with their streamlined online consultation process designed specifically for obtaining Letters of Medical Necessity for fitness expenses.
Offer Details
Service fee: $15 consultation (no video required, text-based only)
Delivery time: Letters emailed within 1 business day
Validity period: 1 year from letter date (future expenses only)
Coverage scope: Gym memberships, fitness classes, personal training expenses
Consultation format: Online questionnaire about health and fitness goals
Geographic availability: All 50 states, 365 days/year
Medical requirement: Must qualify based on health conditions during consultation
Tax advantage: Enables use of pre-tax HSA/FSA dollars for fitness expenses
Eligible venues: Major chains including F45, Anytime Fitness, Orangetheory, YMCA, LA Fitness
Success requirement: Medical provider must approve Letter of Medical Necessity
Reimbursement process: Submit letter and receipts to HSA/FSA administrator separately
Our Thoughts
This service offers solid value for those with qualifying health conditions and existing HSA/FSA accounts. The $15 fee is modest compared to potential annual gym savings (easily $500-2000+ in pre-tax benefits). However, approval isn't guaranteed, and the service only works for future expenses. The tax savings can be substantial - potentially 22-37% depending on your tax bracket - making this worthwhile for committed fitness enthusiasts with appropriate medical justification.
Picture of the Week


